Exclusion rarely needs anyone to try – it happens by default when silence gets mistaken for neutrality. That’s why we don’t treat inclusion as a values exercise. It’s what happens in practice, in the decisions leaders make when something difficult actually happens – not what’s written in a policy.
Your first thought isn’t the problem – what you do next is the choice. People fall back on what they’ve rehearsed, not what’s written down, so the work starts with behaviour and builds outward into systems that hold the standard even when no one’s watching.
I’ve lived this as a founder, not just studied it – building a school from a standing start, watching growth outpace good intentions fast. That’s exactly why this approach starts with systems: I’ve seen how easily exclusion slips in when nobody’s built something to catch it.